[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fn72OH6Ui3oyWquSbNUUmoZwUwVh8fILiLGLk8OMTpgo":3},{"article":4,"iocs":54,"watch_terms":55,"solutions":56,"lesson":59},{"id":5,"title":6,"slug":7,"summary":8,"ai_summary":9,"brief":10,"url":11,"image_url":12,"published_at":13,"ingested_at":14,"relevance_score":15,"entities":16,"category_id":31,"category":32,"article_tags":36},"5e279f9c-9cdf-49f5-bb1f-0ce9e32afc9b","Encryption Is Getting Squeezed From All Sides","encryption-is-getting-squeezed-from-all-sides-d4eec3","Canada’s planned surveillance law is the latest grim step in a series of threats to encryption that are spreading around the world.","Canada's proposed C-22 bill, aiming to enhance law enforcement access to encrypted data, is facing significant backlash from privacy-focused tech companies. Critics argue that mandated backdoors or intentional flaws in encryption, even if not systemic vulnerabilities, pose a severe risk that could be exploited by malicious actors, especially with the rise of AI-powered reverse engineering. Several companies, including Signal and Psiphon VPN, have indicated they may exit the Canadian market if the bill passes, highlighting a global trend of increasing government pressure on encryption.","Canada's proposed C-22 bill threatens encryption, prompting companies to consider leaving the country.","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.wired.com\u002Fstory\u002Fkernel-panic-encryption-is-getting-squeezed-from-all-sides\u002F","https:\u002F\u002Fmedia.wired.com\u002Fphotos\u002F6ad14bcb1efa7811b4f5a5a5\u002Fmaster\u002Fpass\u002FKernel-Panic-Encription-Being-Squeezed-to-Death-Security.jpg","2026-10-17T12:00:00+00:00","2026-10-17T14:00:05.068845+00:00",7,[17,20,22,24,26,29],{"name":18,"type":19},"Signal","product",{"name":21,"type":19},"Psiphon VPN",{"name":23,"type":19},"DuckDuckGo",{"name":25,"type":19},"NordVPN",{"name":27,"type":28},"encryption","technology",{"name":30,"type":28},"AI","c5c77cdb-f7d7-4990-9436-c81dcbff1163",{"id":31,"icon":33,"name":34,"slug":35},null,"Policy","policy",[37,42,47,52],{"category":38},{"id":39,"icon":33,"name":40,"slug":41},"0493c7e9-989a-4692-b4e6-136f5ec09675","Cryptography","cryptography",{"category":43},{"id":44,"icon":33,"name":45,"slug":46},"53f9c4b6-8bc6-4964-9169-d09e5cd41d72","Compliance","compliance",{"category":48},{"id":49,"icon":33,"name":50,"slug":51},"614132b8-5837-4952-b8b5-c6c9a32a1d85","Privacy","privacy",{"category":53},{"id":31,"icon":33,"name":34,"slug":35},[],[18,21,23],{"controls":57,"vendors":58},[],[],{"slug":60,"title":61,"body":62,"framework_refs":63,"framework_notes":73},"government-encryption-backdoors-threaten-global-data-security","Government Encryption Backdoors Threaten Global Data Security","Canada's Bill C-22 exemplifies a growing global trend where governments seek mandated access to encrypted communications, fundamentally undermining the security architecture that protects billions of users. Intentional cryptographic weaknesses — even those framed as 'lawful access' mechanisms — create exploitable vulnerabilities that malicious actors, foreign adversaries, and AI-powered reverse engineering tools can leverage. The departure threats from privacy-focused companies like Signal highlight that weakened encryption doesn't just affect criminals; it erodes trust and security for all users. This matters because once a backdoor exists, it cannot be selectively opened — it becomes a systemic risk for every individual, business, and critical infrastructure system relying on that encryption standard.",[64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72],"NIST SP 800-175B (Guideline for Using Cryptographic Standards)","NIST CSF PR.DS-2 (Data-in-transit protection)","NIST AC-17 (Remote Access)","CIS Control 3.10 (Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit)","CIS Control 14 (Security Awareness and Skills Training)","GDPR Article 25 (Data Protection by Design and by Default)","GDPR Article 32 (Security of Processing)","ISO\u002FIEC 27001 Annex A.10 (Cryptography)","ITIL Service Design — Information Security Management",{}]