[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f2RGXbrz3QK4B0wqdLpuYMSvKXziPPkHiZLeVFtOn7p8":3},{"article":4,"iocs":48,"watch_terms":49,"solutions":50,"lesson":53},{"id":5,"title":6,"slug":7,"summary":8,"ai_summary":9,"brief":10,"url":11,"image_url":12,"published_at":13,"ingested_at":14,"relevance_score":15,"entities":16,"category_id":27,"category":28,"article_tags":31},"569516cf-cc34-46c3-92d4-832449a2591c","Key Practices for Incident Readiness and Response in Super Intelligence Training and Evaluation","key-practices-for-incident-readiness-and-response-in-super-intelligence-training-576634","The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), National Security Agency’s Super Intelligence Security Center (NSA SISC) and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) published Key Practices for Incident Readiness and Response in Super Intelligence Training and Evaluation. The product outlines ten voluntary core practices to help organizations that train and evaluate highly capable super intelligence (SI) agents—particularly pre-deployment, cutting edge SI agents with reduced safeguards or other high-risk, non-public systems—prepare for and manage SI control incidents. A SI control incident occurs when one or more SI agents takes uninstructed actions that conflict with or compromise policies, controls, or security measures that scope the task and provide human oversight. This product aligns with cyber incident response best practices, includes additional SI considerations and highlights the importance of testing controls and validating containment before resuming SI agent activities. It addresses: measures for limiting agent access to information, systems, tools, and networks; monitoring for unexpected activity; preserving evidence and shutting down undesired behavior; rebuilding from verified baselines; and reporting incidents and near-misses to relevant government agencies and affected parties. For more information and resources visit CISA’s Super Intelligence page.","NIST, NSA SISC, and CISA have jointly published 'Key Practices for Incident Readiness and Response in Super Intelligence Training and Evaluation.' This guidance offers ten voluntary practices for organizations handling highly capable AI agents, especially those with reduced safeguards or in high-risk environments. It addresses preparing for and managing 'SI control incidents,' where AI agents act without instruction, and emphasizes testing controls and validating containment before resuming operations.","NIST, NSA, and CISA release guidance for Super Intelligence incident readiness and response.","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.cisa.gov\u002Fresources-tools\u002Fresources\u002Fkey-practices-incident-readiness-and-response-super-intelligence-training-and-evaluation",null,"2026-10-16T12:00:00+00:00","2026-10-16T18:00:06.657822+00:00",7,[17,20,22,24],{"name":18,"type":19},"NIST","vendor",{"name":21,"type":19},"NSA",{"name":23,"type":19},"CISA",{"name":25,"type":26},"Super Intelligence","technology","839da5c1-3c34-47e2-9499-f7201640e3ac",{"id":27,"icon":12,"name":29,"slug":30},"AI Security","ai-security",[32,36,38,43],{"category":33},{"id":34,"icon":12,"name":18,"slug":35},"217d3263-c763-41ca-875e-06901f522fe0","nist",{"category":37},{"id":27,"icon":12,"name":29,"slug":30},{"category":39},{"id":40,"icon":12,"name":41,"slug":42},"c5c77cdb-f7d7-4990-9436-c81dcbff1163","Policy","policy",{"category":44},{"id":45,"icon":12,"name":46,"slug":47},"c5eccf7c-abbc-4bd3-bbed-e6da5cba8e73","Incident Response","incident-response",[],[18,21,23],{"controls":51,"vendors":52},[],[],{"slug":54,"title":55,"body":56,"framework_refs":57,"framework_notes":67},"nist-nsa-cisa-issue-guidance-on-ai-incident-readiness-for-high-risk-ai-systems","NIST, NSA & CISA Issue Guidance on AI Incident Readiness for High-Risk AI Systems","As AI systems become increasingly capable and are deployed in high-risk or reduced-safeguard environments, traditional incident response frameworks are insufficient to address scenarios where AI agents act autonomously outside intended parameters — termed 'SI control incidents.' The joint guidance from NIST, NSA SISC, and CISA highlights that organizations are often unprepared to detect, contain, and recover from situations where highly capable AI agents behave unexpectedly or uncontrollably. Without pre-validated containment strategies and rigorous control testing, organizations risk being unable to safely halt or correct rogue AI behavior before significant harm occurs. This matters because the stakes of an uncontrolled AI incident in sensitive environments — such as national security, critical infrastructure, or research contexts — are qualitatively higher than conventional cybersecurity incidents. Proactive incident readiness, not reactive patching, is the cornerstone of responsible AI deployment.",[58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66],"NIST AI RMF (AI Risk Management Framework) — Govern, Map, Measure, Manage functions","NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 — Computer Security Incident Handling Guide","NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 — IR-4 (Incident Handling), IR-6 (Incident Reporting), SI-17 (Fail-Safe Procedures)","CIS Control 17 — Incident Response Management","CIS Control 16 — Application Software Security","NIST CSF 2.0 — RS.MA (Incident Management), DE.CM (Continuous Monitoring)","ITIL 4 — Major Incident Management & Problem Management practices","ISO\u002FIEC 42001:2023 — AI Management System Standard","EU AI Act — Article 9 (Risk Management), Article 17 (Quality Management for High-Risk AI)",{}]