Anthropic Silently Patches Claude Code Sandbox Bypass
Anthropic silently patched Claude Code sandbox bypass via SOCKS5 null-byte injection vulnerability.
Summary
Anthropic patched a SOCKS5 hostname null-byte injection vulnerability in Claude Code's network sandbox that could have allowed attackers to bypass access controls and exfiltrate data. The flaw, discovered by researcher Aonan Guan, was present from October 2025 until the patch was released in March 2026, but Anthropic did not publicly disclose it or assign a CVE identifier. The vulnerability could have been chained with prompt injection attacks like Comment and Control to steal credentials, environment variables, and infrastructure data.
Full text
A cybersecurity researcher says Anthropic has silently patched a vulnerability that would have allowed an attacker to bypass the Claude Code network sandbox, potentially enabling data exfiltration. Claude Code’s network sandbox funnels all outbound traffic through a local allowlist proxy, silently blocking any connection to unapproved hosts. According to vulnerability researcher Aonan Guan, two Claude Code network sandbox bypasses were discovered recently. One of them, tracked as CVE-2025-66479 and discovered by a different researcher, was related to the sandbox interpreting a setting to block all outbound traffic as ‘allow everything’. This issue was fixed with an update released on November 26, 2025. The second sandbox bypass vulnerability, discovered by Guan, has been described as a SOCKS5 hostname null-byte injection issue. “The userʼs policy says allow only *.google.com. The attacker sends a hostname like attacker-host.com\x00.google.com. The filter sees the trailing .google.com and approves; the OS truncates at the null byte and dials attacker-host.com,” Guan explained.Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading. According to Guan, the vulnerability was present in the Claude Code network sandbox from October 20, 2025, when the sandbox became generally available, until the release of version 2.1.90 in April, around the time he reported it through Anthropic’s bug bounty program on HackerOne. The AI giant marked the vulnerability report as a duplicate. The researcher is displeased that Anthropic has not assigned a CVE identifier to this vulnerability and has not mentioned the issue in its release notes. Moreover, Guan noted that CVE-2025-66479 was assigned to the ‘sandbox-runtime’ library rather than Claude Code itself, and there was no warning to Claude Code users. “A team running [the vulnerable configuration] in production from October 20 through November 26 had no way to know the sandbox was effectively off, and no notice afterwards that it had ever been off. The CVE shipped against a library most Claude Code users do not know exists by name,” the researcher said. Guan recently disclosed details of a prompt injection attack method called Comment and Control. The attack worked against popular AI code security and automation tools, including Claude Code Security Review, Gemini CLI Action, and GitHub Copilot Agent. He and other researchers discovered that AI agents associated with these tools on GitHub Actions could be hijacked using specially crafted GitHub comments, including PR titles, comments, and issue bodies. In his disclosure of the Claude Code sandbox vulnerability, Guan noted that the bypass would have been particularly useful in combination with a prompt injection attack such as Comment and Control, enabling attackers to exfiltrate data, including environment variables, credentials, tokens, and infrastructure data. Contacted by SecurityWeek, Anthropic said it appreciates Guan’s work, but its security team had identified and fixed this issue before receiving the researcher’s report. The AI giant clarified that the fix was included in a public commit to the ‘sandbox-runtime’ repository on March 27 and was shipped in Claude Code 2.1.88 on March 31, before Guan submitted his report via HackerOne on April 3. Related: ‘Claw Chain’ OpenClaw Flaws Allow Sandbox Escape, Backdoor Delivery Related: OpenAI Hit by TanStack Supply Chain Attack Related: Mythos Proves Potent in Vulnerability Discovery, Less Convincing Elsewhere Written By Eduard Kovacs Eduard Kovacs (@EduardKovacs) is senior managing editor at SecurityWeek. He worked as a high school IT teacher before starting a career in journalism in 2011. Eduard holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial informatics and a master’s degree in computer techniques applied in electrical engineering. Daily Briefing Newsletter Subscribe to the SecurityWeek Email Briefing for the latest cybersecurity threats, trends, and expert insights. More from Eduard Kovacs Vulnerability in Popular Conference Software Granted Attackers a 100% Talk Acceptance RateRomanian Hacker Sentenced to Prison in US for Selling Access to State NetworkLA Metro Cyberattack Linked to Iranian State-Sponsored HackersAnthropic Releases New Claude Sandbox, Security Guidance PluginAnthropic Expands Claude’s Enterprise Security Governance With 28 New IntegrationsGhost CMS Vulnerability Exploited to Hack Over 700 WebsitesOncology Institute Discloses Data BreachAnthropic: Mythos Detected 23,000 Potential Vulnerabilities Across 1,000 OSS Projects Latest News In Other News: Trump Mobile Data Breach, FIFA World Cup Phishing, CISA Responds to Supply Chain AttacksCharter Communications Data Breach Could Impact Nearly 5 MillionMokN Raises $15 Million for Phish-Back PlatformGogs Zero-Day Exposes Servers to Remote Code ExecutionCalifornia Sues 23andMe, Alleging It Failed to Protect User Data in 2023 BreachChrome 148 Update Patches 151 VulnerabilitiesRussia-Linked ‘GreyVibe’ Attackers Use AI to Supercharge CyberattacksGeordie Raises $30 Million for AI Security and Governance Platform Trending Daily Briefing NewsletterSubscribe to the SecurityWeek Email Briefing to stay informed on the latest threats, trends, and technology, along with insightful columns from industry experts. Virtual Event: Threat Detection and Incident Response Summit On-Demand Delve into big-picture strategies to reduce attack surfaces, improve patch management, conduct post-incident forensics, and tools and tricks needed in a modern organization. Register Webinar: Third-Party Risk in Practice June 4, 2026 Organizations are investing heavily in third-party risk management, but breaches, delays, and blind spots continue to persist. Join this live webinar as we examine the gap between how organizations think their third-party risk programs are performing and what’s actually happening in practice. Register People on the MoveAnurag Jain has been appointed Senior Vice President of Engineering at CodeHunterCTERA has appointed Tal Sarfaty as Senior Vice President of Cybersecurity.Quantum Secure Encryption has named Michael Massing as Chief Technology Officer.More People On The MoveExpert Insights Raising the Cybersecurity Stakes: Ante up for the Agentic Era CISOs are now facing machine-speed attacks and asking, “How do I agent?” The industry must provide remediation at scale. (Nadir Izrael) Caught Off Guard: Securing AI After It Hits Production As enterprises rush AI projects into production, security teams are increasingly being forced into reactive mode. (Joshua Goldfarb) Cyber Resilience is the New Business Continuity Plan The organizations best prepared to face disruption are those that align security, continuity and risk management around what the business cannot afford to lose. (Steve Durbin) Enhancing Data Center Security Without Sacrificing Performance For AI data centers, where the stakes are the highest and performance constraints are the tightest, security and performance are no longer a zero-sum game. (Nadir Izrael) Is the SOC Obsolete, and We Just Haven’t Admitted It Yet? Many AI-first enterprises have already embraced sovereign architectures for general AI initiatives; cybersecurity—and the SOC—should be next. (Danelle Au) Flipboard Reddit Whatsapp Whatsapp Email
Indicators of Compromise
- cve — CVE-2025-66479