Back to Feed
VulnerabilitiesAug 4, 2026

Decades-Old BMC Vulnerability Exposes Thousands of Data Centers to Attacks

22-year-old BMC vulnerability CVE-2013-4786 exposes 24,000+ data centers to offline password cracking attacks.

Summary

A decades-old vulnerability (CVE-2013-4786) in IPMI 2.0 authentication protocol affects Baseboard Management Controllers (BMCs) across thousands of data centers. The flaw allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain password-derived HMAC hashes via UDP port 623 and crack them offline, with over 24,000 internet-exposed BMCs currently vulnerable. Additional research found weak default credentials and predictable factory passwords on thousands of these critical management interfaces.

Full text

Thousands of data centers are at risk of compromise due to a 22-year-old vulnerability in Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) management processors, data center security firm Lava reports. Found in most server platforms, BMCs enable server management operations even without a working operating system and typically represent some of the most privileged control points in a data center. Through a BMC, administrators can power-cycle the host, perform firmware updates, make low-level platform configuration changes, read hardware sensors, and more, using several management surfaces, including the IPMI out-of-band protocol, the Redfish HTTPS-based management API, and a web-based administrative interface. “In many implementations, these interfaces share the same user database. A credential that works for IPMI may also work for the web interface or Redfish API. This matters because the IPMI authentication process can expose information that enables offline password recovery,” Lava notes. According to the cybersecurity firm, nearly 37,000 internet-exposed server-management interfaces are running the IPMI protocol, and over 24,000 of them disclose password-derived authentication hashes before login. The core issue is CVE-2013-4786, a vulnerability introduced in 2004 in the IPMI 2.0 authentication protocol that allows attackers to obtain password hashes and crack them offline by “obtaining the HMAC from a RAKP message 2 response from a BMC,” a NIST advisory reads.Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading. “During authentication, the BMC can return an HMAC-SHA1 authentication code calculated using the account password and session values known to the requester. An unauthenticated remote party that can reach UDP port 623 can request this response and test password guesses offline,” Lava explains. Attackers could exploit the security defect to recover weak, reused, or default passwords without sending a new request for each potential password candidate, as repeated online login attempts would require. To make matters worse, Lava also discovered that 6,240 of the hosts were accepting an empty username with a weak password, and that 2,340 of them contained a named account, such as Admin or root, that used passwords commonly found in publicly available wordlists. According to the cybersecurity firm, in addition to common passwords, some BMCs were using constrained and predictable factory-issued password formats. “This vulnerability exposes a broader security gap in the data center management plane. BMCs control critical infrastructure, yet they often receive far less monitoring and protection than the systems they manage. Combined with modern GPU cracking and predictable factory passwords, this vulnerability can turn a single exposed BMC into a privileged and difficult-to-detect foothold across the management network,” Lava notes. Related: N‑able Patches Vulnerability Exploited to Hack N-central Servers Related: Patch Bypassed for Supermicro Vulnerability Allowing BMC Hack Related: CISA Warns AMI BMC Vulnerability Exploited in the Wild Related: Recent SonicWall Vulnerabilities Exploited in Ransomware Attacks Written By Ionut Arghire Ionut Arghire is an international correspondent for SecurityWeek. Daily Briefing Newsletter Subscribe to the SecurityWeek Email Briefing for the latest cybersecurity threats, trends, and expert insights. More from Ionut Arghire Brinks Home Discloses Data Breach as Hackers Leak FilesRecent SonicWall Vulnerabilities Exploited in Ransomware AttacksRussian State APT Linked to Recent Public Wi-Fi Gateway HackingRuby on Rails Patches Critical VulnerabilityGoogle AI Uncovers 13-Year-Old Chrome Flaw Amid Record Patching PaceCritical Flaw Allowed to Azure Cosmos DB PwnageCareCloud Data Breach Impacts Over 350,000Critical Code Execution Vulnerability Patched in TeamCity Latest News 150,000 Impacted by Madera Community Hospital Data BreachMicrosoft Bug Bounty Program: $20 Million Paid to 500 ResearchersNew York Awards $9 Million to Strengthen Cybersecurity at 153 Water SystemsBlack Hat USA 2026 – Summary of Vendor Announcements (Part 1)Visa to Acquire Fraud Intelligence Firm BioCatch for $2.4 BillionCyberattack Hits Liechtenstein’s Register of People Behind Companies and FoundationsRiver Bank Says Hackers Deleted Data Stolen in Ransomware AttackHorizon3 Raises $250 Million to Fund Continuing Growth Trending Daily Briefing NewsletterSubscribe to the SecurityWeek Email Briefing to stay informed on the latest threats, trends, and technology, along with insightful columns from industry experts. Webinar: Rethinking Cyber Defense for AI-Speed Attacks August 18, 2026 Join this live webinar as we explore if detection-first security operations can keep pace with AI, or if it’s time to rethink prevention as the strongest default. Register Virtual Event: CodeSecCon 2026 August 19, 2026 CodeSecCon bridges the gap between dev and security. Discover best practices for secure coding, innovative risk-reduction tools, and safe AI integration to cultivate a true DevSecOps culture. Safely secure your apps! Register People on the MovePNC Financial Services Group has appointed Christian Winward as CISO.Brian Gumbel has joined Armadin as Chief Revenue Officer.EigenQ has appointed Mark Pecen as Vice Chairman and Alexander Truskovsky as CISO.More People On The MoveExpert Insights Timeless Compliance: Why Better Questions Beat Bigger Frameworks The best compliance programs aren't the biggest ones. They're the ones built on a short list of questions that can actually be answered, and that still hold true when the models change. (Matt Honea) Is Patching Dead? Vulnerability Management in the Post-Mythos Era You cannot out-patch a machine that writes a working exploit from a vulnerability description in twenty hours. Stop trying to optimize a game you cannot win. (Danelle Au) When Identity Verification Fails: Lessons from a Real-World SIM Swap and Near Account Takeover Identity confidence changes throughout every interaction and should be reassessed continuously as new risk signals emerge. (Torsten George) Legacy Systems, Real-World Impacts: The Reality of OT Security Legacy systems, safety concerns, and critical infrastructure risks make OT vulnerability disclosure one of cybersecurity's most challenging balancing acts. (Tod Beardsley) The Shift Toward Business-Aligned Risk Management Moving from isolated, technical data to a continuous risk lifecycle can help organizations align security controls with actual business consequences. (Steve Durbin) Flipboard Reddit Whatsapp Whatsapp Email

Indicators of Compromise

  • cve — CVE-2013-4786

Entities

Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) (vendor)IPMI (technology)Redfish (technology)Lava (vendor)