Judge Says Pentagon’s Measures Against Anthropic Were ‘Illegal and Baseless’

Summary

A federal judge has ruled that the Pentagon acted illegally by labeling AI company Anthropic as a supply chain risk and punishing it for criticizing the Department of Defense's views on AI use. The judge found the government's actions were retaliatory and not based on any evidence of Anthropic sabotaging its models. Anthropic welcomed the ruling, emphasizing its focus on working productively with the government on AI for national security.

Full text

A federal judge has ruled in favor of artificial intelligence company Anthropic in its legal battle against the Pentagon after the government labeled the company as a supply chain risk earlier this year. U.S. District Judge Rita Lin issued a written order Thursday night that the Pentagon acted illegally by punishing the AI company for its criticism of the Department of Defense’s views on AI use. The government is expected to fight the ruling. The dispute between the AI company and the government broke out in February when President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth accused Anthropic of endangering national security and designated the company a supply chain risk. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei refused to back down over concerns the company’s products could be used for mass surveillance or autonomous armed drones. Lin wrote that the government’s actions “were based on a desire to make a public example out of Anthropic for its ‘arrogance’ in criticizing the government, not based on any articulable basis to believe that Anthropic would actually sabotage its model.” An Anthropic spokesperson said in a statement that they welcome the judge’s ruling: “We remain focused on working productively with the government to harness AI for our national security so all Americans benefit from this technology.” The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading. In the 59-page ruling, Lin, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, wrote that neither the Constitution nor the federal statute the government invoked allows them to “impose sweeping penalties based principally on Anthropic’s critique of the Administration’s views.” Anthropic sued the Pentagon over the supply chain risk designation in March for what it called an “unlawful campaign of retaliation” over its refusal to allow unrestricted military use of its technology. The legal challenge intensified an unusually public dispute over how AI can be used in warfare and mass surveillance. Anthropic’s primary tech industry rival, ChatGPT maker OpenAI, made its own deal to work with the Pentagon just hours after the government punished Anthropic for its stance. Anthropic and OpenAI are each ramping up for buzzy initial public offerings. Anthropic has also filed a separate and narrower case that is still pending in the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. That case involves a different rule the Pentagon is using to try to declare Anthropic a supply chain risk. Earlier in the legal proceedings, Lin had temporarily blocked the Pentagon from labeling the company as a supply chain risk and blocked enforcement of Trump’s social media directive ordering all federal agencies to stop using Anthropic and its chatbot Claude. In a hearing July 30, Lin had said that the government’s position was “really troubling” to her and that it seemed “at odds to me with the First Amendment.” She also said she believed the record had “gotten worse for the government” over time. In that same hearing, Department of Justice lawyers argued that the nature of AI models is “so staggeringly enormous and opaque” that the Defense Department cannot evaluate it in the same way it would a physical piece of hardware. Anthropic lawyer Michael Mongan said in that hearing that the government’s actions “profoundly harm Anthropic” and that they “threaten more broadly to chill speech and debate on a very important issue.” Related: White House Mobilizes Security Firms for Operations Against Foreign Cybercrime Gangs Related: China’s Top Cybersecurity Firms Hit by Mounting Military Procurement Bans Related: White House Launches AI-Driven ‘Gold Eagle’ Vulnerability Coordination Initiative Written By Associated Press Daily Briefing Newsletter Subscribe to the SecurityWeek Email Briefing for the latest cybersecurity threats, trends, and expert insights. More from Associated Press Pro-Russian Hackers Claim Responsibility for Major Cyberattack on Norway’s Public Digital ServicesTaiwan Charges 9 Over Illegal AI Server Exports to China, Including Nvidia and Super Micro StaffUber Fined Nearly $1 Billion by Dutch Regulators Over Automated Suspensions of Driver AccountsTikTok Reaches $400 Million Settlement With US Justice Department Over Children’s PrivacyAI-Assisted Tool Helped Secure Satellite Communication System After 2022 Russian HackingCyberattack Hits Liechtenstein’s Register of People Behind Companies and FoundationsCyberattacks on Minnesota Water Systems Investigated as Officials Warn About Iranian HackersEU to Crack Down on AI Deepfakes, Illicit Imagery and Hacking With New Team in Brussels Latest News Berlin Won’t Pay Extortion Group Claiming Data TheftMore Details Emerge on Exploited PaperCut VulnerabilitiesHasbro Data Breach Exposed Employee Personal InformationIn Other News: Log4j RCE Scare, Minimus Shutdown, Iranian Hacker SanctionsATF Confirms Cyber Incident After Ransomware Group Claims AttackOpenAI Agents Exploited Linux Kernel Flaw on Company’s Own SystemsTech, Cybersecurity Giants Unite Behind OpenAI-Led Cyber Defense PledgeThink You’ve Eliminated Chinese AI? Check the Model’s Lineage, Cisco Says Trending Daily Briefing NewsletterSubscribe to the SecurityWeek Email Briefing to stay informed on the latest threats, trends, and technology, along with insightful columns from industry experts. Virtual Event: Attack Surface Management Summit 2026 September 16, 2026 Join as speakers examine the various components of ASM strategy, the push to mandate continuous asset visibility and inventory tools, and the use of red-teaming, bug bounties and pen-tests in modern security programs. Register Webinar: Minimum Viable Business: Can You Prove Your Organization Would Recover? September 2, 2026 In this live webinar, learn how to define your minimum viable business, identify the systems it depends on, measure actual recovery time against business requirements, and present the gaps to the board as measurable risk. Register People on the MoveSocial engineering protection company Doppel has promoted Alyssa Smrekar to Chief Marketing Officer.Naveen Bhateja has been appointed Chief People Officer at HackerOne.The Department of War has appointed Sonu Shankar as Principal Deputy Chief Information Officer.More People On The MoveExpert Insights The Future of AI-Driven Security Depends on Complete Data For twenty-five years, "data" in security meant logs and events. But logs are a lossy representation of reality. (Danelle Au) The MFA Identity Trap: When Authentication Creates a False Sense of Security Organizations must distinguish identity verification, authentication and threat detection, or risk successfully authenticating the attackers they are trying to stop. (Torsten George) Silent Patches Don’t Stop Attackers – They Blind Defenders Silent patches can become exploit intelligence for attackers while leaving defenders without the context needed to prioritize risk. (Tod Beardsley) Hired for One Job, Judged on Another: The CISO’s Real Problem The skills that get a CISO hired are rarely the skills they are judged on later. Most security leaders are stuck in that gap. Closing it is the real job. (Sravish Sridhar) Rethinking Application Security for the AI Era As AI dramatically shortens the time from vulnerability disclosure to exploitation, enterprises must look beyond patching to reduce application risk. (Joshua Goldfarb) Flipboard Reddit Whatsapp Whatsapp Email

Entities