What it asks for. The organisation must conduct risk assessments that identify threats and vulnerabilities, judge likelihood and impact, consider privacy risks to individuals, integrate supply chain and mission considerations, document results, review them, share them with stakeholders and update them when conditions change.
In practice. This means a repeatable methodology, a risk register with owners, treatment decisions and target dates, and assessments triggered by significant changes such as new systems or major threat developments. Auditors expect the methodology, completed assessments, the register and evidence of management review. ISO/IEC 27005, ISO/IEC 27001 clause 6 and NIS2 all build on the same approach.
Common gaps. Assessments are often generic, not linked to real assets, and not updated after major changes. Risk acceptance decisions frequently lack a named owner or expiry date.